Unions
Trade unions are one of the types of organizations in which Wikicracy is worth using. I recommend reading the comments under this video. It seems that those countries that have more trade unions are richer.
Czytaj dalejCommunities without hierarchy
Trade unions are one of the types of organizations in which Wikicracy is worth using. I recommend reading the comments under this video. It seems that those countries that have more trade unions are richer.
Czytaj dalejBottom-up = from each individual person, through a group of several, and further through a larger group to a group that includes everyone. Top-down = from the managing authority of all, through smaller groups, to a single person. Subsidiarity = every power, and in particular political power, should have an auxiliary (supporting) and stimulating significance in relation to the efforts of the autonomous and independent individuals who established it. Since we are already a group that wants to govern on
Czytaj dalej1. Like you, I believe that people who promote democracy are discouraged by the lack of interest or even hostility on the part of citizens. This observation is a good start to realize that despite the overwhelming evidence that db works, most are against it. What is really surprising is that it is not the government that is the biggest opponent – it is the citizens who are most opposed to db. Once we have come to terms with this
Czytaj dalejWhen a party leader gets into parliament, he gets very concrete benefits. He gets:– power over members of his party which allows him to create regulations – he gets access to TV so he can convince millions of people of his reasons – he gets very specific money to live and to achieve his own goals such as election campaign or winning allies With such equipment, a politician no longer needs citizens – he is able to cope on his
Czytaj dalejIf the idea of a group is based on the assumption that politicians will listen to the group, then such a group can be liquidated by the cheeks at any time. It is enough for politicians to stop listening to the group's commands. Instead, the purpose of the group should be to help each other and establish common rules that are beneficial to all members of the group. Cooperation with politicians is possible only after many years of the group's
Czytaj dalejEdward Abramowski "Brotherhood, solidarity, cooperation" Many thanks to the Association "Citizens to Citizens" for their work for the benefit of citizens. Read more: https://nowyobywatel.pl/biblioteka-obywatela/braterstwo-solidarnosc-wspoldzialanie/
Czytaj dalejWikicracy stores information about who recommended whom. Thanks to this, if someone attacks your group by adding a large number of their henchmen, there will be a chance to defend yourself because you will know from whom the attack began and who belongs to the enemy group. That is why it is worth following the rule that a new person is added by the one who knows this person and guarantees his honesty. Exception: Such information is missing only in
Czytaj dalejPerhaps the "Skip effect" is responsible for this:https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efekt_pomini%C4%99cia
Czytaj dalejIn existing cooperatives, it is often the case that a small group takes power and control over the situation. It is very difficult to prevent this because the turnout in elections and at general meetings is very low. Ordinary inhabitants also do not have a well-formed view on many issues, so many of them vote in a random manner. The group in power, on the other hand, knows in advance how to vote on every issue and everyone votes the
Czytaj dalejThis method is not new. It was invented by Edward Abramowski some 150 years ago. Abramovsky's idea has the advantage over other ways that it does not require the consent of politicians. Action is required only from us – citizens. The idea is this It is necessary to create a cooperative, attract as many participants as possible, thus build a civic lobby and force politicians* to introduce referendums on a national scale. Such a group will succeed if it is
Czytaj dalejWikicracy votes work just like real Swiss referendums. Each referendum has 2 stages: 1. Collecting signatures for a referendummotion 2. The number of signatures collected under the referendum motion is public from the beginning so that the initiator of the referendum has information whether he must agitate for his idea or not. The result of the referendum itself (the number of votes For and Against) is visible only after its completion. This information is secret so as not to suggest
Czytaj dalejCurrently, setting up a group is not automated, but setting up a group will not be troublesome for you. All you have to do is gather the first 3 people, send their emails and names/nicknames to me and I will set up a Wikicracy instance for you. It will be a separate application with a separate database, so from that moment your group will have full control over voting and accepting new people. You also need to set a name
Czytaj dalejHow much time do I have to devote? You don't need much time to participate in a group. It is only important to be informed what decisions are being made. Thanks to this, you will be able to react if something happens that does not suit you. The average turnout in Swiss referendums is 40%, but even if it is lower, it does not mean that citizens lose control of the situation.In both Switzerland and Wikicracy, the law is always
Czytaj dalejPaper no. 1699 portalsamorzadowy.pl/prawo-i-finanse/zygmunt-frankiewicz-koniecznosc-nowelizowania-wszystkich-ustaw-to-patologia,68577.html instytutobywatelski.pl/17617/komentarze/ku-dobrej-samorzadnosci Civilhub – application code github.com/CivilHub/CivilHub Wikicracy – application code hgithub.com/soma115/wikikracja Iceland citizens.is stjornarskrarfelagid.is More information wikikracja.pl Chat discord.gg/JWSJM64
Czytaj dalejThe impact of civil society organisations on citizens' well-being peterturchin.com/cliodynamica/strange-disappearance/
Czytaj dalejWe have ourselves as the smartest.We consider the people we talk to or know well to be almost as smart as we are.On the other hand, we consider people about whom we know nothing to be stupid and bad. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C5%82udzenie_ponadprzeci%C4%99tno%C5%9Bci
Czytaj dalejMost of the needs of people nowadays are met by companies and the state. Independence from other people is considered a luxury. The requirement to get along with others is seen as troublesome.
Czytaj dalejThe purpose of Wikicracy is to allow the community to decide for itself. Being able to direct our own destiny should make us create principles that reward justice, noble attitudes, broad horizons, unconditional love, compassion, a friendly attitude, and correct statements and predictions.
Czytaj dalejAnonymity of votes is not needed if everyone in the group has the same interest. However, if someone from the group wants to win something for themselves, then transparency begins to be a problem. With open voting, a selfish person can:– see who their ally is- see if allies voted as they agreed– pressure people who vote differently Peer pressure The influence of peer pressure on decisions is well illustrated by Asch's experiment. It is very difficult to have a
Czytaj dalej
Recent Comments